http://gusiev.com/2009/07/computer-science-programming-criticism-object-database-design/ How to make your web application Fri, 30 Jul 2010 11:55:35 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 http://gusiev.com/2009/07/computer-science-programming-criticism-object-database-design/#comment-202 Sean Torry Fri, 11 Jun 2010 08:06:50 +0000 http://gusiev.com/?p=26#comment-202 Hi Russia very interesting story. i like it and also enjoy.. very interesting story. i like it and also enjoy.. ]]> http://gusiev.com/2009/07/computer-science-programming-criticism-object-database-design/#comment-103 Bogdan Gusiev Thu, 22 Oct 2009 06:39:46 +0000 http://gusiev.com/?p=26#comment-103 Sure http://gusiev.com/2009/07/computer-science-programming-criticism-object-database-design/#comment-102 Polprav Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:50:17 +0000 http://gusiev.com/?p=26#comment-102 Hello from Russia! Can I quote a post in your blog with the link to you? Can I quote a post in your blog with the link to you? ]]> http://gusiev.com/2009/07/computer-science-programming-criticism-object-database-design/#comment-82 Bogdan Gusiev Fri, 31 Jul 2009 11:15:40 +0000 http://gusiev.com/?p=26#comment-82 The monkey is monkey. It will not become human and there is nothing you can do with it. And the human is a human. In other words you should train monkey as a monkey and human as a human. http://gusiev.com/2009/07/computer-science-programming-criticism-object-database-design/#comment-81 Dimitris Andreou Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:21:42 +0000 http://gusiev.com/?p=26#comment-81 What is this... a recipe to train monkeys instead? Seriously. http://gusiev.com/2009/07/computer-science-programming-criticism-object-database-design/#comment-79 Bogdan Gusiev Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:34:27 +0000 http://gusiev.com/?p=26#comment-79 Thanks, Owen for your comment. Once when I was picking up the theme for my scientific effort, my scientific supervisor said: You do not know to much yet that is why you can be optimistic push the most crazy ideas that may change the world. The case when you seeking the answer yourself is a key point where you can be innovative. I am always trying to understand how things work(or just try) and only then go and learn what others think about it. You do not know to much yet that is why you can be optimistic push the most crazy ideas that may change the world. The case when you seeking the answer yourself is a key point where you can be innovative.
I am always trying to understand how things work(or just try) and only then go and learn what others think about it. ]]> http://gusiev.com/2009/07/computer-science-programming-criticism-object-database-design/#comment-78 Owen Fellows Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:26:01 +0000 http://gusiev.com/?p=26#comment-78 I find your comments here rather depressing in that you are saying only learn about things you need to know. This means there is no innovation no striving to make things better. I agree that often you need to take shortcuts to "Do it as fast as possible" but this does not mean you have to sacrific good programming style as in the end debugging hacked together code will probably take longer than writing it correctly in the first place. I also disagree with your framwork comment, you should have atleast a high level understand of how a framework performs its function mainly so you can tell if you are using it correctly. Yes dropping code in to a framework will give quick results but if you then move to another client that does not have this framework how to you reuse your knowledge, you can't as you have no understanding of the underlying execution of your code. I also agree that a Normalized database is not realistic in the real world but is this because it has already been written badly, due to lack of knowledge, or because design decisions have been made e.g. for performance. Even if it is not possible in the most part it should still be strived for. Sorry for the long post but becoming a great programmer, developer, design, architect is about gaining knowledge about how things work so you can extend and improve them. If we just use frameworks instead of understanding them we ultimatly reduce our own value.